בְנ֖וֹ

Alphabet Analysis

The word

1. word🔊 בְנ֖וֹ

   ve-NO

   his son
2. phraseyour reading level🔊 מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה בְנ֖וֹ

   me-na-SHE ve-NO

   Manasseh his son
3. clause🔊 וַיִּמְלֹ֛ךְ מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה בְנ֖וֹ תַּחְתָּֽיו׃

   va-yim-LOKH me-na-SHE ve-NO ta-KHTAV

   and he reigned Manasseh his son in his place or instead of him
4. sentence🔊 וַיִּשְׁכַּ֥ב חִזְקִיָּ֖הוּ עִם־אֲבֹתָ֑יו וַיִּמְלֹ֛ךְ מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה בְנ֖וֹ תַּחְתָּֽיו׃

   va-yish-KAV khiz-ki-YA-hu im-a-vo-TAV va-yim-LOKH me-na-SHE ve-NO ta-KHTAV

   and he lay down or slept Hezekiah with his fathers and he reigned Manasseh his son in his place or instead of him

Exegesis

The second clause opens with vayimlokh {וַיִּמְלֹךְ | wayyimlōḵ} ‘and he reigned’ in a construct chain menasheh beno takhtav {מְנַשֶּׁה בְּנוֹ תַּחְתָּיו | mĕnāššê bə-nō ṯaḥtāyw} identifying the successor and his assumption of office; takhtav marks dynastic succession ‘in his place’. In the formal version, an initial “Then” preserves narrative sequence and the subject-verb-object order aligns with English norms. In the dynamic version, “was gathered to his ancestors” conveys the death euphemism, and “took the throne” expresses accession in contemporary idiom.