1 Kings 16:33ExegesisTAB

1 Kings 16 : 33 Idolatry | Provocation | Judgment
33. Linguistic Exegesis
The Hebrew narrative employs the vav-consecutive prefixes vayaas {וַיַּ֥עַשׂ | va-yyaʿăś} ‘and he made’ and vayyosef {וַיּ֨וֹסֶף | wayyōsēp̄} ‘and he added’ to structure a progression of actions. The infinitive constructs la'asot {לַעֲשׂ֗וֹת | laʿăśōt} ‘to do’ and lehakhiis {לְהַכְעִיס֙ | lə-hakhʿîs} ‘to provoke to anger’ form a purpose clause indicating deliberate offense. The accusative is marked by et {אֶת־ | ʾet} ‘direct object marker’ before both ha'asherah {הָאֲשֵׁרָה | hāʾăšērāh} ‘the Asherah’ and Yahweh {יְהֹוָה | Yəhōwāh} ‘LORD’, highlighting the cultic object and the divine target. The comparative phrase mikol malkei Yisrael {מִכֹּל מַלְכֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל | mikkōl malkê yisrāʾēl} ‘more than all the kings of Israel’ quantifies the extent of provocation, while the relative clause asher hayu lefanav {אֲשֶׁר הָיוּ לְפָנָיו | ʼăšer hāyû lə-pānāw} ‘who were before him’ situates the action in historical contrast.

More on this verse