ὧν

Alphabet Analysis

The word

1. word🔊 ὧν

   hôn

   of which
2. sentence🔊 εἰ μὲν οὖν ἀδικῶ καὶ ἄξιον θανάτου πέπραχά τι οὐ παραιτοῦμαι τὸ ἀποθανεῖν εἰ δὲ οὐδέν ἐστιν ὧν οὗτοι κατηγοροῦσίν μου οὐδείς με δύναται αὐτοῖς χαρίσασθαι Καίσαρα ἐπικαλοῦμαι

   ei men oun a-di-KO kai A-ksi-on tha-NA-tou PE-pra-KHA ti ou pa-rai-TOU-mai to a-po-tha-NEIN ei de ou-DEN es-TIN hôn HOU-toi ka-tê-go-ROU-sin mou ou-DEIS me DY-na-tai au-TOIS kha-RI-sas-thai KAI-sa-ra e-pi-ka-LOU-mai

   if indeed then I do wrong and worthy of death I have done anything not I refuse the to die if but nothing is of which these accuse me no one me is able to them to grant Caesar I appeal

Exegesis

The second condition, introduced by ei de {εἰ δὲ | eí dè}, reverses the scenario: ouden estin hōn houtoi kategorousin mou {οὐδέν ἐστιν ὧν οὗτοι κατηγοροῦσίν μου | oudén estin hôn hoûtoi katēgoroûsin mou} uses ouden as a predicate nominative with estin, while the relative genitive hōn links to the content of the accusations, with houtoi and mou specifying accusers and accused.