יִתְּזִ֥ין

Alphabet Analysis

The word

1. word🔊 יִתְּזִ֥ין

   yit-ZEEN

   was fed
2. phraseyour reading level🔊 יִתְּזִ֥ין כָּל־בִּשְׂרָֽא׃

   yit-ZEEN kol-bis-RA

   was fed all flesh
3. sentence🔊 עָפְיֵ֤הּ שַׁפִּיר֙ וְאִנְבֵּ֣הּ שַׂגִּ֔יא וּמָזוֹן לְכֹ֖לָּא־בֵֽהּ תְּחֹתֵ֣והִי תַּטְלֵ֣ל חֵיוַ֣ת בָּרָ֗א וּבְעַנְפֹ֤והִי֙ יְדֻר֣ן יְדוֹרָ֔ן צִפְּרֵ֖י שְׁמַיָּ֣א וּמִנֵּ֖הּ יִתְּזִ֥ין כָּל־בִּשְׂרָֽא׃

   a-fe-YEH sha-PIR ve-in-BEH sa-GI u-ma-ZON le-kho-LA-beh te-kho-TE-hi tat-LEL kheh-WAT ba-RA u-ve-an-FO-hi ye-DUN ye-DOR tsif-RE she-ma-YA u-min-NEH yit-ZEEN kol-bis-RA

   its leaves beautiful and its fruit abundant and food for all was in it under it found shade the beasts of the field and in its branches dwelt lived birds of the heavens and from it was fed all flesh

Exegesis

The final clause, umineh {וּמִנְהּ | û-min-neh} “and from it” with yitszin {יִתְּזִין | yit-zîn} “is fed” and kol-bisra {כָּל־בִשְׂרָא | kol-bis-rāʾ} “all flesh,” uses an Ithpaal (passive-reflexive) form to stress that every living creature receives sustenance from this single source. Throughout, repeated third masculine singular suffixes (-eh / -hî) on opyeho, veinbeh, lekholla-beh, tehotohi, uveanpohi, and umineh bind all benefits—beauty, fruit, shade, and food—back to the same great tree. In translation, English finite verbs (“was,” “were shaded,” “dwelt,” “was fed”) and standard subject–verb–object order make explicit what the Aramaic conveys through nominal clauses and verbal aspect, while preserving the progression from appearance, to provision, to universal shelter and nourishment.