אֲשֶׁ֥ר

Alphabet Analysis

The word

1. word🔊 אֲשֶׁ֥ר

   a-SHER

   who or which
2. phraseyour reading level🔊 אֲשֶׁ֥ר בִּתְלַאשָּֽׂר׃

   a-SHER bit-la-sar

   who or which in Telassar
3. clause🔊 וְרֶ֥צֶף וּבְנֵי־עֶ֖דֶן אֲשֶׁ֥ר בִּתְלַאשָּֽׂר׃

   ve-RE-tsef u-ve-NE-e-DEN a-SHER bit-la-sar

   and Rezeph and sons of Eden who or which in Telassar
4. sentence🔊 הַהִצִּ֨ילוּ אֹתָ֜ם אֱלֹהֵ֤י הַגּוֹיִם֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר שִׁחֲת֣וּ אֲבוֹתַ֔י אֶת־גּוֹזָ֖ן וְאֶת־חָרָ֑ן וְרֶ֥צֶף וּבְנֵי־עֶ֖דֶן אֲשֶׁ֥ר בִּתְלַאשָּֽׂר׃

   ha-hi-TSI-lu o-TAM e-lo-HEI ha-go-YIM a-SHER shi-kha-TU a-vo-TAI ET-go-ZAN ve-ET-kha-RAN ve-RE-tsef u-ve-NE-e-DEN a-SHER bit-la-sar

   have they delivered them gods of the nations which they destroyed my fathers {direct object} Gozan and {direct object} Haran and Rezeph and sons of Eden who or which in Telassar

Exegesis

The subject Elohei hagoyim {אֱלֹהֵי הַגּוֹיִם | ʾĕ-lō-hê ha-gō-yîm} ‘gods of the nations’ is specified by the relative clause asher shikhatu avotai {אֲשֶׁר שִׁחֲתוּ אֲבוֹתַי | ʾă-šer ši-ḥə-tû ʾă-vō-ṯai} ‘which my fathers destroyed,’ emphasizing decisive defeat. The repetition of the direct-object marker et before Gozan and Haran organizes the enumeration of conquered places.

The construct u-vnei-Eden {וּבְנֵי־עֶדֶן | u-və-nê-ʾe-ḏen} ‘and the sons of Eden’ together with the relative clause asher bi-Tel-Assar {אֲשֶׁר בִּתְלַאשָּׂר | ʾă-šer bə-ti-lā-ʾaš-šār} ‘who were in Tel Assar’ precisely locates the group. English formal retains the sharp interrogative structure, while dynamic clarifies lineage and updates word order for readability.