Acts 21:3ExegesisTAB

Acts 21 : 3 Travel | Navigation | Arrival
3. Linguistic Exegesis
The opening aorist participle anaphanantes {ἀναφάναντες | anaphánantes} functions temporally as a circumstantial participle introducing the initial sighting of Cyprus; it pairs with katalipontes {καταλιπόντες | katalipóntes}, another aorist participle, to mark a sequence of actions that precede the main imperfect verb epleomen {ἐπλέομεν | epléomen} ‘we were sailing.’ The adjective euonymon {εὐώνυμον | euṓnymon} as a modifier of Kypron {Κύπρον | Kýpron} specifies the ship’s orientation “to our left,” a typical navigational detail. The narrative then uses the prepositional phrase eis Syrian {εἰς Συρίαν | eis Syrían} to indicate direction of travel, followed by the aorist verb katelthomen {κατήλθομεν | katḗlthomen} ‘we went down’ marking alighting at Tyron {Τύρον | Týron}. The adverb ekeise {ἐκεῖσε | ekeîse} ‘there’ confirms the location, and the conjunction gar {γὰρ | gàr} introduces the explanatory clause. In that clause, the imperfect en {ἦν | ên} links to the subject to ploion {τὸ πλοῖον | tò ploîon}, with the present participle apophortizomenon {ἀποφορτιζόμενον | apophortizómenon} governing the object ton gomon {τὸν γόμον | tòn gómon}, literally “being-unloaded the cargo,” which is rendered as “was to unload its cargo” (formal) or “was stopping … to unload what it carried” (dynamic) to convey both the scheduled and ongoing nature of the action. This structure of participial chaining and causal gar-clause is expressed through English subordinate temporal and causal clauses to preserve the sequence of movements and the reason for pausing at Tyre.

More on this verse