| 7. Linguistic Exegesis Kare {קָרֵא | qā-rēʾ} ‘he cried’ opens with an emphatic Peal perfect, creating an urgent command. Malka {מַלְכָּא | mal-kāʾ} serves as the subject with bechayil {בְּחַיִל | bə-ḥa-yil} ‘with might’ intensifying the summons. The Haphel infinitive leheʿala {לְהֶעָלָה | lə-he-ʿā-lā(h)} ‘to bring in’ governs the series leʾashpaya {לְאָשְׁפַיָּא | lə-ʾāš-pa-yāʾ}, kasdaʾei {כַּשְׂדָּאֵי | kaś-dā-ʾē}, and vegazraya {וְגָזְרַיָּא | wə-gāz-rā-yāʾ}. Aneh {עָנֵה | ʿā-nē(h)} ‘he answered’ and veʾamar {וְאָמַר | wə-ʾā-mar} ‘and said’ introduce the king’s address. A double relative clause di…dî {דִּי | dî} frames the condition (diyikre {דִּי־יִקְרֵה | dî-yi-krē} ‘who reads’ ketava {כְּתָבָה | kə-tā-vā} dena {דְנָה | de-nā} and upishreh {וּפִשְׁרֵהּ | ū-piš-rēh} ‘and its interpretation’ yechavinnani {יְחַוִנַּנִי | yə-ḥa-win-na-nî} ‘makes known to me’). Three coordinated imperfects—yilbash {יִלְבַּשׁ | yil-bash}, vehamnikha dîdahava alterzavareh {וְהַמְנִיכָא דִי־דַהֲבָא עַל־צַוְּארֵהּ | wə-ham-nî-kā dî-da-hā-wā ʿal-ṣaw-wə-reh}, and utelti bemalkuta yishlat {וּתְלִתִּי בְמַלְכוּתָא יִשְׁלַט | ū-te-lit-tî bə-mal-ku-tā yiš-laṭ}—outline the promised attire and rank, characteristic of Aramaic royal edicts. |