| 33. Linguistic Exegesis The Hiphil participle hamotsi {הַמּוֹצִ֤יא | hamōṣîʾ} functions as the subject of the relative clause emphasizing divine causation. The fused direct-object marker in etkhem {אֶתְכֶם֙ | ʾetkhem} identifies Israel as the recipient of deliverance. The prepositional phrase me’erets mitsrayim {מֵאֶ֣רֶץ מִצְרַ֔יִם | mēʼereṣ miṣrāyim} provides historical‐geographical context. The infinitive lihyot {לִהְיוֹת֥ | lihyōt} introduces a purpose clause with lakhem leElohim {לָכֶ֖ם לֵאלֹהִ֑ים | lā-khem lēʼĕlōhîm}, establishing the covenant relationship. The emphatic pronoun ani {אֲנִ֖י | ʾănî} precedes Yahweh {יְהוָֽה | Yəhōwāh} for rhetorical self‐declaration. In English the clause order is adjusted to foreground the covenant formula while preserving Hebrew causative and purpose structures. |