| 16. Linguistic Exegesis The verse opens with a negative conditional protasis ei de me akouse {εἰ δὲ μὴ ἀκούσῃ | eî dè mḗ akoús-ē}, which sets a hypothetical boundary for hearing the offender. The aorist imperative paralabe {παράλαβε | pará-la-be} with meta sou {μετὰ σοῦ | metà soû} commands bringing companions, and the adverb eti {ἔτι | é-ti} modifies hena ē dyo {ἕνα ἢ δύο | hé-na ḕ dý-o} to indicate additional persons. A purpose clause introduced by hina {ἵνα | hí-na} governs the forensic idiom epi stomatos {ἐπὶ στόματος | epì stó-ma-tos} plus the genitives dyo marturon ē trion {δύο μαρτύρων ἢ τριῶν | dý-o mar-týr-ōn ḕ tri-ṓn}, specifying the required witnesses. The passive subjunctive stathe {σταθῇ | sta-thḗ} expresses the result that pan rhema {πᾶν ῥῆμα | pân rhê-ma} stands established, underlining communal accountability and legal verification in church discipline. |