| 17. Linguistic Exegesis The verse presents a two-stage conditional with protases introduced by ei {εἰ | eí} and ean {ἐὰν | eàn}, each employing the aorist subjunctive parakousē {παρακούσῃ | parakoúsē} to express potential refusal. The first protasis leads to the imperative eipe {εἰπὲ | eípe} “tell,” signaling public escalation before the ekklēsia {ἐκκλησίᾳ | ekklēsía}. The second protasis, marked by de kai {δὲ καὶ | dè kaí}, intensifies the scenario, culminating in the imperative éstō {ἔστω | éstō} “let him be,” which reclassifies the unresponsive as hōsper ho ethnikos kai ho telōnēs {ὥσπερ ὁ ἐθνικὸς καὶ ὁ τελώνης | hṓsper ho ethnikós kai ho telōnēs}. The progression from private warning to communal judgment is underscored by the comparative hōsper and the shift in fellowship rather than an expression of punitive animus. |